So, I hear traces of prosperity theology almost every time I talk to a Christian (at least an American Christian). Believing God to provide for us is one thing. But buying into the idea that Christians, because of our relationship with God, are supposed to be wealthy, healthy and happy is patently unbiblical. I think this kind of teaching has, one, diminished the glory of God (that would take its own blog to explain) but has also created in many believers a very shallow, immature, skewed, and weak view of God.Which leads me to today’s passage. I find it hard to justify prosperity theology in light of John the Baptist’s life. In John 1:76, John’s father prophesies about his life:
“And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Most High; For you will go on before the Lord to prepare His ways.”
John was to be the preeminent evangelist/preacher of his day. He was not just a prophet of the Most High; he was THE prophet of the Most High. He was apparently a pretty popular guy. Matthew 3:5 says “...all Judea and all the district around the Jordan” were going out to him to be baptized in the Jordan River. Mark 5:5 says “all the country of Judea was going out to him, and all the people of Jerusalem” and they were “confessing their sins.” So God’s blessing was clearly on John’s life and ministry.
And Luke 1:66b makes it even clearer: “For the hand of the Lord was certainly with him.”
Now, according to the prosperity plan, John’s faithfulness to God and God’s hand of blessing on him should have secured him a pretty dope life. (I mean, after all, he’s the "head and not the tail" right?) But did it?
What did his life look like? “Now John himself had a garment of camel’s hair and a leather belt around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey” (Matthew 3:4). Now, some of you might be thinking, “Hmmm, camel hair and a leather belt? Tailor that crap up and he might’ve been a G!” No, no. This wasn’t a fitted trench with some K.Cole boots. One commentator says, “John’s garments were common to nomadic desert dwellers and thus were associated with poorer people.” As for the locusts and wild honey, he says they “were not an unusual source of food for people living in the desert. The desert locus is…still eaten today by poorer people in the Middle East and Africa.”
How did life turn out for him? Read Matthew 14:1-12. Wouldn’t God have rescued His prophet? Had they been taught the message of health and wealth, wouldn’t John’s disciples have expected “the prophet of the Most High” to be miraculously saved from death? And life and death are in the power of the tongue, right? How come he couldn’t just speak his safety into existence?
Ahhh, I have so much more to say about this. But I’ll leave it open for discussion.
For an amazing sermon on this, click here and listen to 5.25.08 Hope in Real Life.


